Yea, that shouldn’t be a problem.

Frank

From: Kaleb Keithley [mailto:kkeithle@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 4:42 AM
To: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Cc: Ganesha-devel <devel@lists.nfs-ganesha.org>
Subject: [NFS-Ganesha-Devel] Re: Implementing NFSv4 -> POSIX ACL mapping in FSAL_VFS

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 4:56 AM Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net> wrote:

I'd like advice on whether using libacl is likely to be acceptable,
since it should mean less code.

Off hand I can't imagine why not. libacl is already used in both FSAL_GLUSTER and FSAL_CEPHFS.

--

Kaleb