On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 08:39 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 08/10/2018 08:08 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >> Hey all! >> ... >> >> glusterfs-client-xlators-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> glusterfs-api-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> nfs-ganesha-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 >> centos-release-gluster310-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >> glusterfs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> glusterfs-cli-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 >> glusterfs-server-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> glusterfs-libs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> glusterfs-fuse-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> glusterfs-ganesha-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >> > > For nfs-ganesha problems you'd really be better served by posting to > support@ or devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org. > > Both glusterfs-3.10 and nfs-ganesha-2.4 are really old. glusterfs- > 3.10 > is even officially EOL. Ganesha isn't really organized enough to > have > done anything as bold as officially declaring 2.4 as having reached > EOL. > > The nfs-ganesha devs are currently working on 2.7; maintaining and > supporting 2.6, and less so 2.5, is pretty much at the limit of what > they might be willing to help debug. > > I strongly encourage you to update to a more recent version of both > glusterfs and nfs-ganesha. glusterfs-4.1 and nfs-ganesha-2.6 would > be > ideal. Then if you still have problems you're much more likely to get > help. > Hi, thank you for your answer, but it raises even more questions about any potential production deployment. Actually, I knew that the versions are old, but it seems to me that you are contradicting yourself: https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-July/031753.html "After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work (yet).