Since this is in the Coverity system (unlike the internal runs I've done in
the past) I think we can mark these as either 'intentional' or as 'false
positive' and they might even be remembered from one run to the next.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:46 AM Daniel Gryniewicz <dang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It seems coverity really doesn't like LTTng tracepoints. Or
passing
"len - 1" to memcpy.
Daniel
On 8/18/22 07:27, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> We hadn't run a Coverity analysis for quite some time, so we ran an
> analysis today.
>
> The NFS-Ganesha project dashboard is at [1].
> The results for the latest working version (4.0.8) are at [2].
>
> [1]
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/nfs-ganesha?tab=overview
> <
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/nfs-ganesha?tab=overview>
> [2]
https://scan8.scan.coverity.com/reports.htm#v51942/p10586
> <
https://scan8.scan.coverity.com/reports.htm#v51942/p10586>
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
--
Kaleb