3.2 is newer, and therefore has more bug fixes, than 2.8.3. It also has much more development, so it has more potential bugs. I would consider the newest stable version (3.2 in this case) to be the most stable version. That said, we are about to release new versions of both 2.8.x and 3.x in the next week or two, so you may want to wait for that. Daniel On 4/8/20 10:40 PM, Todd Pfaff wrote:
I'm having stability problems with nfs-ganesha 2.8 and PROXY FSAL on CentOS 7.
I haven't yet tried nfs-ganesha 3.0 but I could probably quickly and easily move to that if there is an advantage in doing so.
Before I spend time switching from 2.8 to 3.0, can anyone tell me whether either of these versions of nfs-ganesha is considered to be more stable than the other?
centos-release-nfs-ganesha28.noarch : NFS-Ganesha 2.8 packages from the CentOS : Storage SIG repository centos-release-nfs-ganesha30.noarch : NFS-Ganesha 3.0 packages from the CentOS : Storage SIG repository
What about PROXY FSAL in either of these versions - is one or the other known to be more stable?
Is there a more robust version of nfs-ganesha and PROXY FSAL that I should consider trying instead?
Thanks, Todd _______________________________________________ Support mailing list -- support@lists.nfs-ganesha.org To unsubscribe send an email to support-leave@lists.nfs-ganesha.org