12 Apr
2025
12 Apr
'25
12:23 a.m.
While our product is Lustre-based, we don't use the HSM feature, which I think is the only thing that FSAL_LUSTRE adds (from memory). From that point of view I wouldn't be too concerned to see the current FSAL_LUSTRE removed. However, if we get some more non-POSIX Lustre features, which is a possibility, then we might (attempt to) bring back an expanded FSAL_LUSTRE. In that case we would commit to supporting it. peace & happiness, martin