That would very much break FSAL API for out-of-tree FSALs, and it should be only a couple of lines to bodge in a fix. Something like this: https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/437140 On 12/12/2018 07:58 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
I just posted comments in long ago merged patches:
https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/401028/
https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/401029/
pointing out some places where we leak references.
I wonder if it might be better to back out the async work from 2.7.1 since it wasn’t completed (and then fix the one reference leak I found that is there even before the async work), and then I’ll get these properly fixed in 2.8?
Frank
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.nfs-ganesha.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.nfs-ganesha.org