10 Aug
2018
10 Aug
'18
4:14 a.m.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06:50:41AM -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
What I don't understand now: why is it still trying to clnt_call, when it has already been told the chan is EINVAL?
I don't know if that's the reason, but I noticed that nfs_rpc_get_chan() explicitly ignores the return value of nfs_rpc_create_chan_v40(): if (!chan->clnt) (void)nfs_rpc_create_chan_v40(clientid, flags); Rolf -- Rolf Anders ............................ http://www.rz.uni-augsburg.de Universität Augsburg, Rechenzentrum ............. Tel. (0821) 598-2030 86135 Augsburg .................................. Fax. (0821) 598-2028