[NFS-Ganesha-Devel] Re: Implementing NFSv4 -> POSIX ACL mapping in FSAL_VFS

Yea, that shouldn’t be a problem. Frank From: Kaleb Keithley [mailto:kkeithle@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 4:42 AM To: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net> Cc: Ganesha-devel <devel@lists.nfs-ganesha.org> Subject: [NFS-Ganesha-Devel] Re: Implementing NFSv4 -> POSIX ACL mapping in FSAL_VFS On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 4:56 AM Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net <mailto:martin@meltin.net> > wrote: I'd like advice on whether using libacl is likely to be acceptable, since it should mean less code. Off hand I can't imagine why not. libacl is already used in both FSAL_GLUSTER and FSAL_CEPHFS. -- Kaleb