Thanks Daniel, I will see if we can wait for v4 or I will backport to v3.x .
I can understand that the conversion to posix acl will be a lossy one. I'm also
looking to ricahcl to address the issue.
Regards
Rafi KC
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang(a)redhat.com>
Sent: 01 July 2020 06:07 PM
To: Rafi Kavungal <rafi.kavungal(a)iternity.com>; support(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org;
devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
Subject: Re: [NFS-Ganesha-Devel] ACL support with NFS-Ganesha V3 and the stability of v4
acl implementation
NFSv3 ACLs were recently added to the 4.x development codebase. It's never, as far as
I know, been tested with Gluster, but the code is in place, and can be used. There's
no current timeframe for a 4.0 release, but it's a small, self-contained patch, so
it's not impossible to backport it to a 3.x version.
NFSv4 ACLs have been available and supported for a long time, they should work fine (with
the usual caveat that NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs are not fully compatible, so there could
be issues if the full NFSv3 ACL semantics are needed).
Daniel
On 7/1/20 3:35 AM, Rafi Kavungal wrote:
Hi All,
We want to use nfs-ganesha with gluster and we have a requirement to
use acl with both v3 and v4. But going through the previous mail
archives, I understood that acl is not supported with v3. Is there any
chance of acl support with v3 in near future. How easy is to implement this feature in
v3.
An addition question is regarding the stability of acl with v4. Is
there any known issues? Is it ready for using it in the production
setup. Any users who consumes acl on v4?
Any help is much appreciated, Thanks in advance.
Rafi KC
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org To unsubscribe send
an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org