On 11/16/2018 11:27 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
Matt added support for %url includes to ganesha a few months ago.
Unfortunately though, the current URL format doesn't allow you to
specify a RADOS namespace and we need that for our main use-case...
Should we rev the rados:// url format to be like this?
rados://<pool>/<namespace>/<object>
What we could do is just assume that if there are only two components in
the URL that the namespace is NULL, for backward compatibility (and for
the case where someone wants to use the default namespace).
Thoughts?
Sounds fine to me.
Daniel