That would very much break FSAL API for out-of-tree FSALs, and it should be only a couple of lines to bodge in a fix. Something like this: https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/437140

On 12/12/2018 07:58 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > I just posted comments in long ago merged patches: > > https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/401028/ > > https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/401029/ > > pointing out some places where we leak references. > > I wonder if it might be better to back out the async work from 2.7.1 > since it wasn’t completed (and then fix the one reference leak I found > that is there even before the async work), and then I’ll get these > properly fixed in 2.8? > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org To unsubscribe send > an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org