On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:09 PM Malahal Naineni <malahal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Are the issues specific to CEPHs fsal? If not, I would like to see a branch at regular
NFS-Ganesha project repo.
Regards, Malahal.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:07 AM Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> We have support for an NFS gateway over cephfs in nautilus, but we're
> currently building nfs-ganesha packages from the V2.7-stable branch.
> That branch lacks quite a few patches that will be in V2.8 that we
> require, but some of those patches are probably a bit much to take in
> the upstream V2.7-stable branch.
>
> I'd like to change the nfs-ganesha-stable builds for nautilus to pull
> from a branch in our own fork, at least temporarily. We already have a
> fork of nfs-ganesha in the ceph github organization. I can push a
> branch there that would be suitable.
>
> Would anyone have objections to doing that?
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)redhat.com>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
I've gone ahead and pushed the branch here:
https://github.com/ceph/nfs-ganesha/tree/V2.7-ceph
Most of the patches in there are Ceph-specific, but there are a few
that are not. I expect Dan will pick up some subset of these patches
for the next V2.7-stable release, but likely not all of them.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)redhat.com>