not at all; they can be scavenged after a period of time--I thought
we did that already, though perhaps we're just keeping up to hi-water
mark DRCs? so among other things, yes, we should be able to more
aggressively garbage collect old sessions.
Matt
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:08 PM Pradeep <pradeep.thomas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:10 PM Matt Benjamin <mbenjami(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Do you mean, should we change how we do so?
Actually two questions: Is there a good reason to keep the DRC structures (drc_t and the
RB tree off of that) forever? If not, what is the best way to free up DRC memory.
Thanks,
Pradeep
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:01 PM Pradeep Thomas <pradeepthomas(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > With NFS traffic simulators like Load-Dynamix (LDX), I see that the ganesha
takes up few of gigs of memory very quickly. For example, with 100 client IPs and 2000
ports per IP, ganesha will create 200K DRCs (drc_t) with 1K DRC-entries in each (each
entry keeps an NFS request of size around 1K). Is it a good idea to cleanup DRCs at some
point?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pradeep
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matt Benjamin
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
> Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
>
>
http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage
>
> tel. 734-821-5101
> fax. 734-769-8938
> cel. 734-216-5309
--
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage
tel. 734-821-5101
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309