On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06:50:41AM -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
What I don't understand now: why is it still trying to
clnt_call,
when it has already been told the chan is EINVAL?
I don't know if that's the reason, but I noticed that nfs_rpc_get_chan()
explicitly ignores the return value of nfs_rpc_create_chan_v40():
if (!chan->clnt)
(void)nfs_rpc_create_chan_v40(clientid, flags);
Rolf
--
Rolf Anders ............................
http://www.rz.uni-augsburg.de
Universität Augsburg, Rechenzentrum ............. Tel. (0821) 598-2030
86135 Augsburg .................................. Fax. (0821) 598-2028