That would very much break FSAL API for out-of-tree FSALs, and it should 
be only a couple of lines to bodge in a fix.  Something like this:
https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/437140
On 12/12/2018 07:58 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
 I just posted comments in long ago merged patches:
 
 
https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/401028/
 
 https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/401029/
 
 pointing out some places where we leak references.
 
 I wonder if it might be better to back out the async work from 2.7.1 
 since it wasn’t completed (and then fix the one reference leak I found 
 that is there even before the async work), and then I’ll get these 
 properly fixed in 2.8?
 
 Frank
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org