Since this is in the Coverity system (unlike the internal runs I've done in
the past) I think we can mark these as either 'intentional' or as 'false
positive' and they might even be remembered from one run to the next.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:46 AM Daniel Gryniewicz <dang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 It seems coverity really doesn't like LTTng tracepoints.   Or
passing
 "len - 1" to memcpy.
 Daniel
 On 8/18/22 07:27, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
 >
 > We hadn't run a Coverity analysis for quite some time, so we ran an
 > analysis today.
 >
 > The NFS-Ganesha project dashboard is at [1].
 > The results for the latest working version (4.0.8) are at [2].
 >
 > [1] 
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/nfs-ganesha?tab=overview
 > <
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/nfs-ganesha?tab=overview>
 > [2] 
https://scan8.scan.coverity.com/reports.htm#v51942/p10586
 > <
https://scan8.scan.coverity.com/reports.htm#v51942/p10586>
 >
 > --
 >
 > Kaleb
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
 > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
 _______________________________________________
 Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
 
-- 
Kaleb