7:04 p.m.
See https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V5.8-proposed/ for a
propsed merge for V5.8
A few bits:
I left in the V6-dev.x commits for markers, they would be removed in the
final.
Also, ntirpc will need a V5.8 tag which would be pulled up instead of the
arbitrary commit.
Please have a look.
So far this compiles.
Frank
8:18 p.m.
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:04:41 -0700, "Frank Filz"
<ffilzlnx(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
See https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V5.8-proposed/ for
a
propsed merge for V5.8
Looks sane to me. I can't say I reviewed every commit but browsing
through the commits there doesn't seem to be anything unreasonable for
a stable release.
I did notice the documentation for Readdir_Res_Size has bit-rotted, so
submitted https://review.gerrithub.io/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/1178206
peace & happiness,
martin
7:56 a.m.
On 3/12/24 21:18, Martin Schwenke wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:04:41 -0700, "Frank Filz"
<ffilzlnx(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
> See https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V5.8-proposed/ for a
> propsed merge for V5.8
Looks sane to me. I can't say I reviewed every commit but browsing
through the commits there doesn't seem to be anything unreasonable for
a stable release.
I did notice the documentation for Readdir_Res_Size has bit-rotted, so
submitted https://review.gerrithub.io/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/1178206
Looks good to me, I'll tag ntirpc ASAP.
Daniel
5:33 p.m.
Should https://review.gerrithub.io/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/1177971 make it to
V5.8 ? Use after free scenarios are pretty bad.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:03 AM Daniel Gryniewicz <dang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 3/12/24 21:18, Martin Schwenke wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:04:41 -0700, "Frank Filz"
> <ffilzlnx(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> See https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V5.8-proposed/ for a
>> propsed merge for V5.8
>
> Looks sane to me. I can't say I reviewed every commit but browsing
> through the commits there doesn't seem to be anything unreasonable for
> a stable release.
>
> I did notice the documentation for Readdir_Res_Size has bit-rotted, so
> submitted https://review.gerrithub.io/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/1178206
>
Looks good to me, I'll tag ntirpc ASAP.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
5:43 p.m.
Another one: https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/issues/1062 will
this be fixed in V5.8?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 4:33 PM David Rieber <drieber(a)google.com> wrote:
Should https://review.gerrithub.io/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/1177971 make
it
to V5.8 ? Use after free scenarios are pretty bad.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:03 AM Daniel Gryniewicz <dang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 3/12/24 21:18, Martin Schwenke wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:04:41 -0700, "Frank Filz"
> > <ffilzlnx(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> >> See https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V5.8-proposed/ for a
> >> propsed merge for V5.8
> >
> > Looks sane to me. I can't say I reviewed every commit but browsing
> > through the commits there doesn't seem to be anything unreasonable for
> > a stable release.
> >
> > I did notice the documentation for Readdir_Res_Size has bit-rotted, so
> > submitted https://review.gerrithub.io/c/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/+/1178206
> >
>
> Looks good to me, I'll tag ntirpc ASAP.
>
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.nfs-ganesha.org
>
248
days inactive
250
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel Gryniewicz -
David Rieber -
Frank Filz -
Martin Schwenke